Govern the agents your teams use and build, at the point of action.

Agents take actions instead of only returning answers, which widens the risk from disclosure to execution. Three ordinary agent capabilities combine into something more dangerous than any one of them alone: access to private data, exposure to untrusted content, and the ability to communicate externally. An agent with those three can become an exfiltration path if its instructions, tools, or context are manipulated, and its blast radius is the sum of the systems its credentials can reach.

Route them through a gateway that evaluates each call before it reaches an external system. Aurascape’s MCP Gateway inspects Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool calls on supported paths, verifies them against approved tools, and blocks unapproved or unsanctioned calls by default. Because the same session’s model conversation is also governed, policy can account for what the agent was asked to do and what it then tried to do.

Tool poisoning hides a malicious instruction inside the description or metadata of a tool an agent can discover at runtime. Models read tool descriptions as direction rather than as data, so a compromised or malicious MCP server can influence what an agent does next without touching the agent’s own code. In governed deployments, Aurascape inspects that exchange and blocks the poisoned tool and the resulting connection before data leaves.

Yes, Aurascape discovers local agents, employee-used agents, agents embedded in SaaS applications, internally built agents, and MCP servers connected without IT oversight. It maintains a catalog of registered servers with their tools, a risk score, and a security scan, and it flags tools it finds operating outside the gateway.

They cover part of it. A secure web gateway and a CASB reason about destinations and channels, data loss prevention reasons about content and known patterns, and that work still matters when agents arrive. What those controls were not designed for is the agent execution path, where an approved destination can carry an impermissible action and the decision has to happen before a tool call lands. Governance built only on destination filtering and log review inherits that gap.

Aurascape surfaces the MCP servers, tool calls, and data exchanges an internally built agent uses, and enforces boundaries on agent identity and tool access. Agents can also be stress-tested with simulated prompt injection and jailbreak attempts before release, so weaknesses surface before production. For developers, the gateway deploys by prepending one prefix to existing MCP server URLs, so adoption does not require rewriting the agent.

Aurascape keeps an audit-ready record of agent conversations, tool calls, and data exchanges, with data lineage showing where information moved across systems. That answers which agent acted, on whose behalf, which records it touched, and what it did next, including MCP activity. In governed deployments the record is built as the activity happens, so it does not have to be reconstructed from separate logs afterward.